Many people are starting to receive
copies of subpoenas from QOTD Film Investment Ltd sent to them by their
Internet service provider, like Comcast or AT&T.
If you received a QOTD Film Investment Ltd Subpoena or were served a Summons, call us at 312-201-8310 or click here to Talk to a Lawyer For Free
The best thing to do is to talk with an experienced lawyer.
This is what clients say Antonelli Law is very good at:
QOTD Film Investment Ltd.files federal copyright infringement lawsuits involving the film titled “Queen of the Desert.” The film was directed by Werner Herzog and features Nicole Kidman, James Franco and Damian Lewis. The film tells the story of the life of Gertrude Bell, a traveler, explorer and archaeologist during the early 20th Century. The film is set to be released in theaters in March 2016.
To date, QOTD Film Investment Ltd. has only filed lawsuits in Arizona and Oregon. Thirty-seven John Doe defendants have been targeted so far. The company is represented by Attorney Carl Crowell in Oregon and Attorney Gregory Collins in Arizona.
Like other BitTorrent peer-to-peer file-sharing cases, QOTD Film Investment Ltd. accuses defendants of copyright infringement by using software and the internet to obtain the film "Queen of the Desert" without paying the appropriate license fee.
Antonelli Law can help you nationwide if you have received an ISP letter informing you a subpoena for your identity was received, or if you are served with a summons or waiver of service.
For immediate advice and a free initial consultation call attorney Jeffrey Antonelli at 312-201-8310 or fill out our simple contact page or email us with a request to call you back at a time that is convenient for you. We understand the shock you may be feeling from receiving a notice of this action, and have the experience to help you deal with this in the best way possible for you. Attorney referrals accepted.
Antonelli Law is Very Experienced Defending BT Claims
Antonelli Law has represented over 1500 clients dealing with copyright trolls and satellite piracy trolls. We have gained a great deal of insight into what works and what is a waste of your time and money. We have no desire to have you spin your wheels with legal work that does not advance your defense and only racks up lawyer fees. However, we are experienced litigators and are prepared to defend clients vigorously. Either way, we will never put our interests ahead of your own.
Hiring Antonelli Law Is No More Expensive than Hiring a Local Attorney in Your State
Antonelli Law's numerous federal court admissions, local counsel affiliations, and the nature of federal lawsuits allow us to effectively and cost-consciously represent you in your copyright infringement defense, no matter which state you live in - and no more expensively than a local attorney.
We are able to represent you in your federal case without being more expensive or more difficult to hire than hiring a local attorney because federal courts require attorneys to file their papers electronically, and often conduct hearings by telephone. This makes frequent trips to the courthouse unnecessary. Also, we do not charge for airline flights or flying travel charges. Clients pay only for the normal travel time to the courthouse any local attorney would charge.
Finally, we have affiliated local counsel in a number of states who have earned our trust and can appear in court on an expedited basis when necessary. We will of course be in court personally when necessary such as non-routine hearings or a trial.
An Overview of BitTorrent Copyright Infringement
To get an overview of this type of litigation and what you might expect to experience, click here for Jeffrey Antonelli's article Torrent Wars, published by the Illinois State Bar Association's Intellectual Property section.
See our motions to quash page and give us a call to speak with an attorney about filing a motion to quash the subpoena your ISP received for your account information and name.
See our should I settle? page if you are thinking about possibly settling and give us a call.
Recent Press on Antonelli Law
Our Legal Services
We offer a reasonable Flat Fee for motions to quash, and helping you settle and remain anonymous in many cases; and reasonable fees for defending you if you are named as a defendant in a copyright infringement lawsuit such as the QOTD Film Investment Ltd. lawsuit.
Selected severe financial hardship cases are handled on a reduced or pro bono basis. We accept attorney referrals and clients for Illinois, Indiana, Colorado, Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, New Jersey, New York, Florida, and other states' federal file-sharing cases. This is a swiftly changing area of law and we continually follow the latest developments.
Antonelli Law Ltd. provides advice based on years of solid litigation experience representing consumers and businesses and concentrates in representing people accused of BitTorrent copyright infringement. You need serious legal advice for your copyright troll defense - not from a firm who can only try to negotiate a settlement but has little or no actual litigation experience. Our last complex trial involved computer firewalls, sophisticated commercial networks, and a Microsoft certified expert. We have the credentials to back up our advice and settlement postures, and the other side knows it.
A copy of the QOTD Film Investment Complaint can be found here and is duplicated in the following cases:
Southern District of California
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe 3:16-cv-00749
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe 3:16-cv-00756
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe 3:16-cv-00759
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe 3:16-cv-00773
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe 3:16-cv-00926
District of Colorado
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe 1 et al 1:16-cv-01366
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe 1 et al 1:16-cv-01300
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe 1 et al 1:16-cv-01260
District Court of Arizona
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Does 1-30 2:16-cv-00407
Middle District of Florida
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe 6:16-cv-00453
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe 8:16-cv-00627
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe 8:16-cv-00628
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe 8:16-cv-00629
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe 8:16-cv-00631
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe 6:16-cv-00453
District of Hawaii
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Does 1-9 1:16-cv-00189
Northern District of Illinois
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Does 1-33 1:16-cv-02457
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Does 1-24 1:16-cv-02458
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Does 1-14 1:16-cv-02461
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Does 1-28 1:16-cv-02462
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Does 1-17 1:16-cv-02464
District of Louisiana
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe 2:16-cv-02588
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe 2:16-cv-02803
District of Michigan
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Does 1-18 2:16-cv-11274
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Does 1-18 2:16-cv-11275
District of Nevada
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Does 1-30 2:16-cv-00928
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Does 1-37 2:16-cv-00929 - this case was voluntarily dismissed on June 29 2016.
Eastern District of New York
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe et al 1:16-cv-01902
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe et al 1:16-cv-00925
District Court of Oregon
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe 3:16-cv-01408
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe 3:16-cv-01081
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe 3:16-cv-00930
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe 3:16-cv-00523
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe 3:16-cv-00524
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe 3:16-cv-00525
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Does 1-7 3:16-cv-00246
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe 3:16-cv-00715
Western District of Washington
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe et al 2:16-cv-00371
35 East Wacker Drive, Suite 1875
Chicago, IL 60601
Tel (312) 201-8310