Contact Us Today:
312.201.8310

Criminal Productions Inc - Help for Subpoenas and Summons

Received a Criminal Productions Inc. subpoena or summons?


Many people are starting to receive copies of subpoenas from Criminal Productions Inc. sent to them by their Internet service provider, like Comcast or AT&T.

If you received an Criminal Productions Inc Subpoena or were served a Summons, call us at 312-201-8310 or click here to Talk to a Lawyer For Free

The best thing to do is to talk with an experienced lawyer.

  • Learn about what the notice means.
  • Do you want to quickly and anonymously make this go away by resolving the lawsuit by settling?
  • Or do you want to prepare to fight the lawsuit?
  • Should you file a motion to quash the subpoena
  • Ask every question that concerns you.

This is what clients say Antonelli Law is very good at:

  • Reducing your anxiety about the problem
  • Giving clear information to help you decide what to do
  • Responsive and accessible via phone and email
  • Tenacious and effective lawyers in lawsuit litigation
Our fees are reasonable and most cases are resolved out of court for a flat legal fee of $750 - $1,000 for anonymous settlements.

Antonelli Law has been defending clients accused of BitTorrent copyright claims since 2011 and Jeffrey Antonelli has been a civil litigator for over 15 years. 
We've helped over 1,500 clients across the country deal with being targeted in federal copyright lawsuits.  See below for recent press on attorney Jeffrey Antonelli.


What is the Criminal Productions Lawsuit About?


Criminal Productions, Inc. is filing federal copyright infringement lawsuits involving the film titled “Criminal” with Ryan Reynolds, Kevin Costner, and Gary Oldman. The film plot involves the implantation of a dead CIA agent's memories into the mind of a convict.

Like other BitTorrent peer-to-peer file-sharing cases,
Criminal Productions, Inc. accuses defendants of copyright infringement by using software and the internet to obtain the film "Criminal" without paying the appropriate license fee.

Usually your first notice about the Criminal Productions Inc. lawsuit is a letter from your ISP such as AT&T, CenturyLink, Charter, Comcast, Cox, Time Warner, or Verizon and a subpoena. The letter notifies you that the ISP has been subpoenaed to release your name to the plaintiff.

The letter often mentions your right to file in court a motion to quash or vacate the subpoena. In the case of
Criminal Productions, Inc, once your name is released you are probably going to receive a letter from the attorneys who represent Criminal Productions, Inc. offering a settlement although you could immediately named in a lawsuit and served with a summons and complaint. Don't call them, you can incriminate yourself! Call us for a free attorney consultation at 312-201-8310
.

To date, Criminal Productions, Inc. has filed lawsuits in Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, Oregon, and Washington. The company is represented by the law firm Crowell Law in Oregon, Gregory Collins in Arizona, Scott Kannady in Colorado, Mike Hierl in Illinois, and David Lowe in Washington.

Antonelli Law can help you nationwide if you have received an ISP letter informing you a subpoena for your identity was received, or if you are served with a summons or waiver of service.


For immediate advice and a free initial consultation call attorney Jeffrey Antonelli at 312-201-8310, fill out our simple contact page, or email us with a request to call you back at a time that is convenient for you. We understand the shock you may be feeling from receiving a notice of this action, and have the experience to help you deal with this in the best way possible for you. Attorney referrals accepted.

Antonelli Law is Very Experienced Defending BT Claims

Antonelli Law has represented over 1500 clients dealing with copyright trolls and satellite piracy trolls. We have gained a great deal of insight into what works and what is a waste of your time and money. We have no desire to have you spin your wheels with legal work that does not advance your defense and only racks up lawyer fees. However, we are experienced litigators and are prepared to defend clients vigorously. Either way, we will never put our interests ahead of your own.

Hiring Antonelli Law Is No More Expensive than Hiring a Local Attorney in Your State 

Antonelli Law's numerous federal court admissions, local counsel affiliations, and the nature of federal lawsuits allow us to effectively and cost-consciously represent you in your copyright infringement defense, no matter which state you live in - and no more expensively than a local attorney. 

We are able to represent you in your federal case without being more expensive or more difficult to hire than hiring a local attorney because federal courts require attorneys to file their papers electronically, and often conduct hearings by telephone. This makes frequent trips to the courthouse unnecessary. Also, we do not charge for airline flights or flying travel charges. Clients pay only for the normal travel time to the courthouse any local attorney would charge. 

Finally, we have affiliated local counsel in a number of states who have earned our trust and can appear in court on an expedited basis when necessary. We will of course be in court personally when necessary such as non-routine hearings or a trial.

An Overview of BitTorrent Copyright Infringement

To get an overview of this type of litigation and what you might expect to experience, click here for Jeffrey Antonelli's article Torrent Wars, published by the Illinois State Bar Association's Intellectual Property section.

More Information

See our motions to quash page and give us a call to speak with an attorney about filing a motion to quash the subpoena your ISP received for your account information and name. 

See our should I settle? page if you are thinking about possibly settling and give us a call. 

Recent Press on Antonelli Law


Our Legal Services

We offer a reasonable Flat Fee for motions to quash, and helping you settle and remain anonymous in many cases; and reasonable fees for defending you if you are named as a defendant in a copyright infringement lawsuit such as the Criminal Productions, Inc. lawsuit. 

Selected severe financial hardship cases are handled on a reduced or pro bono basis. We accept attorney referrals and clients for Illinois, Indiana, 
Colorado, Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, New Jersey, New York, Florida, and other states' federal file-sharing cases. This is a swiftly changing area of law and we continually follow the latest developments. 

Antonelli Law Ltd. provides advice based on years of solid litigation experience representing consumers and businesses and concentrates in representing people accused of BitTorrent copyright infringement. You need serious legal advice for your copyright troll defense - not from a firm who can only try to negotiate a settlement but has little or no actual litigation experience. Our last complex trial involved computer firewalls, sophisticated commercial networks, and a Microsoft certified expert. We have the credentials to back up our advice and settlement postures, and the other side knows it.  

A copy of the Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Does Complaint can be found here and is duplicated in the following cases:


District of Arizona
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-17 2:16-cv-01526

District of California
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 3:16-cv-02
589
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe
3:16-cv-02352
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 3:16-cv-02353

District of Colorado

Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1-13    1:16-cv-01836
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al 1:16-cv-01813
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al 1:16-cv-01802
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al 1:16-cv-01761
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al 1:16-cv-01724
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al 1:16-cv-01698
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al 1:16-cv-01688
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al 1:16-cv-01649
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al 1:16-cv-01649
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al 1:16-cv-01589
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al 1:16-cv-01575

District of Florida
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 6:16-cv-01731
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 6:16-cv-01729

Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe
8:16-cv-02794
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 8:16-cv-02795

District of Illinois
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-18 1:16-cv-05500
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-15 1:16-cv-05501
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-24 1:16-cv-05503
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-27 1:16-cv-05504
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-12 1:16-cv-05505
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-19 1:16-cv-05507
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-17 1:16-cv-05509
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-17 1:16-cv-05511
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-11 1:16-cv-05513
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-28 1:16-cv-05515


District of Kentucky
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Does (1
-6) 3:16-cv-00701

District of Maryland

Crimina
l Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al 8:16-cv-03208


District of New York
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe et al 7:16-cv-07900
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al 1:16-cv-04360

District of Nevada
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Does 2:16-cv-01968
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Does 2:16-cv-02201
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Does 2:16-cv-02689
Criminal Productions v Does 2:16-cv-02691
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Does 2:16-cv-02704


District of Oregon

Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 3:17-cv-00240
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 3:17-cv-00157

Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 3:17-cv-00156

Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 3:16-cv-02904

Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 3:16-cv-01695

Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 3:16-cv-01696
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 3:16-cv-01697
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 3:16-cv-01628
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 3:16-cv-01523
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 3:16-cv-01514
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 3:16-cv-01369
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 3:16-cv-01310
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 3:16-cv-01309
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 3:16-cv-01094
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 3:16-cv-01082
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 3:16-cv-00729
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 3:16-cv-00730
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 3:16-cv-00731
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 3:16-cv-00732

District of Pennsylvania
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Does (1-5) 2:17-cv-00
706

District of Virginia

Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 2:17-cv-00
079

District of Washington

Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al (1-8) 2:17-cv-00102
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al
2:16-cv-01647

Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al
2:16-cv-01588
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al 2:16-cv-01589

Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe et al
2:16-cv-01351
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe et al 2:16-cv-01352
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. De 1 et al 2:16-cv-01272
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al 2:16-cv-01177
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al 2:16-cv-01016
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al 2:16-cv-00860
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 2:16-cv-00729


35 East Wacker Drive, Suite 1875
Chicago, IL 60601

Tel (312) 201-8310

Blogs

Torrent Defenders
There was an error retrieving your RSS feed
DieTrolDie
There was an error retrieving your RSS feed

Antonelli Law Copyright Attorneys

Jeffrey Antonelli
Nationwide

Melissa Brabender
Nationwide


Amelia Niemi
Nationwide


Byron Ames
Local Counsel for Nevada & Utah


Tristan Robinson
Local Counsel for Texas


Mark Del Bianco
Local Counsel for Maryland & DC


Leslie Farber
Local Counsel for NY, NJ, Pennsylvania


Peter Glazer
Local Counsel for Virginia









Copyright Case Menu

Website Builder